Monday, November 10, 2014

"All that proceeds from power is good. All that springs from weakness, is bad."

- Friedrich Nietzsche

"All that which proceeds from man's independent ego is good; all that which proceeds from dependence upon men is evil."

- Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead.

Ayn Rand was known to have heavily studied the works of Nietzsche and also to be in strong disagreement of his philosophy. She has mentioned a logical reason for it in the preface of The Fountainhead. Yet she seems to have been unable to resist the influence of his works on her writings and philosophy. The question is, should her disagreement with Nietzche's philosophy be called non-absolute, or should it be called an absolute disagreement to the inconsistent and contradictory parts of Nietzsche's philosophy? I haven't "HEAVILY" studied Nietzsche but I found Thus Spake Zarathustra confusing from the beginning. I left it unfinished. Now, after reading this quote of Ayn Rand, I have grown a renewed interest in TSZ.

Guzaarish (2010) Euthanasia

I saw Guzaarish today, a film released in the year 2010 starring Hrithik and Aishwarya. Based on the subject of Euthanasia (mercy killing).

It is a sad thing that Hrithik reminds us of Koi Mil Gaya everytime he sounds excited. But apart from that, his acting in the film, expressions AND Dialog deliveries are superb. To see the great duggu dancer as a paralyzed person in the film would have certainly left me with a feeling of 'there's something missing'. Flashback took care of that. I remember being quite excited about watching the film when its trailers played on TV back in 2010, especially the one in which he dances with his assistant, the song Yeh Tera Jiqra Hai playing in the background.

I also remember a lot of jeering and denouncing of the film by several political parties had been received because of a trailer in which Aishwarya was shown smoking. I hated that row for its biased stand. They protested because a woman was shown smoking a cigarette, which apparently sent out a bad message. If they or anyone really, sincerely wanted to protest they should have protested the smoking scene altogether. I myself had laughed at the news that time. I smirked today while watching that scene. It could have been skipped, as all smoking scenes in all the films can be skipped, but being there it added a little flavour, and humor too.

Dialogs and scenes - I loved all of them. Except one. I feel the need to mention it. Aditya Roy Kapoor tells Hrithik that he would sacrifice Magic, his passion, for his love if his girlfriend asks for it. I wished, hoped and expected Hrithik to shout at him and order him out of the house at that moment. But he smiled. And I winced.

Love, as a rule, does not ask for compromise. If it does, it is not love. It is merely a stubborn and forced PLEA. Stubborn, because it won't listen to reason. Forced, because it would blackmail emotionally, and PLEA, because it will inadvertently acknowledge its own impotent compatibility and yet ask us to accept it like that. It is not very difficult to recognise this flaw, what IS difficult for most is the admittance to themselves that the idea of love that exists in their partner's view is horribly flawed. The simple solution is to leave the partner. But if we choose to stay with their idea of love, we not only betray the concept of love, but we also betray the concept of passion. If we compromise our passion for our 'love', then we lose both - love and passion. We realize yet refuse to accept the fact that we are incapable of loving and we are just not passionate enough.

I winced for the same reason when I saw Makarand Deshpande who plays a passionate artist being potrayed as a scoundrel who beats his seperated wife and forces her to stay with him. And while being beaten up she complains of his choosing his paintings over her. Being passionate to the core about one's work is potrayed as BAD in this film. Just by these two incidents. And they would certainly have their effect on the audience engulfed in watching the film and being the part of the flowing story. Compromise is shown as a virtue.

I liked Hrithik's conversation with the Church Father the most. Also the hearing at his home where he displays the 'magic trick' of 60 seconds. Predictable. Yet amusing, effective and Fantastic.

Euthanasia - Only the man who fully recognises the value of life, not just HIS life, but life as a concept, for the whole significant part of it, should be given the permission to die. In this film, Hrithik through his acting, aptly conveyed the message and gave justice to the character and the film.

The film had received four stars back then, and justly so. I don't like writing reviews, I avoid them when I can. This is the first film which made me write about it.


- Kaustubh Anil Pendharkar